Should You Ever Loan Money to Your Kids? Dave Ramsey Says “No!”

Photo of Carl Sullivan
By Carl Sullivan Updated Published

Quick Read

  • Parents giving informal loans with vague repayment terms create a hidden social cost that damages relationships.

  • Personal finance expert Dave Ramsey advises against ever making a loan to a family member.

  • Anyone can use the debt snowball method: Pay off smaller debt first, working your way up to bigger obligations.

  • Are you ahead, or behind on retirement? SmartAsset's free tool can match you with a financial advisor in minutes to help you answer that today. Each advisor has been carefully vetted, and must act in your best interests. Don't waste another minute; learn more here.

This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.
Should You Ever Loan Money to Your Kids? Dave Ramsey Says “No!”

© FPG / Retrofile RF via Getty Images

Megan from New Jersey didn’t expect a car accident to become a lesson in family dynamics. After the crash totaled her vehicle, her emergency fund covered the hospital bill, but her parents stepped in with a $5,000 loan for a used car. Her parents said pay them back “whenever you can,” but Megan said: “I feel terrible whenever I talk to them.”

That guilt prompted her to ask The Ramsey Show whether she should pay her parents back before tackling her existing debt: $25,000 in student loans and $5,000 on credit cards. Dave Ramsey’s answer went deeper than repayment order.

The Verdict on Family Loans

Ramsey’s blanket position: “Parents should never, under any circumstances, loan their children money. If you have the money to help them and you want them to have the money, give it to them. As a matter of fact, you should not loan any relatives money under any circumstances. Period. If you’re not willing to give it to them, shut up.”

Family loans can create a hidden liability that no balance sheet captures: the ongoing social cost of an unresolved obligation between people who love each other. Megan’s parents aren’t charging interest, but the loan still costs her something every time she picks up the phone.

Why “Pay Whenever You Can” Is the Most Expensive Loan Term

Informal family loans feel generous because they carry no stated interest rate and no fixed repayment schedule. In practice, vague terms can create more anxiety than a standard loan agreement. A bank loan has a payoff date. A parent loan has Thanksgiving. “Thanksgiving dinner tastes different when you eat with your master, and the borrower is slave to the lender,” Ramsey said. Co-host George Kamel added: “The interest payment on that is your relationship.”

In terms of repayment order, Ramsey advised Megan to follow the debt snowball method: pay off smaller debts before working your way up to the larger ones. Ramsey believes this approach generates psychological momentum. So first up for Megan are both her credit cards and the parent loan.

The “Debt Avalanche” Alternative

While the snowball focuses on psychological wins, many experts suggest the **Debt Avalanche** (or “Landslide”) method for maximum mathematical efficiency. In a high-interest market, this means targeting the highest interest rates first. Even though Megan owes $5,000 to both her credit cards and her parents, she should prioritize the credit cards since balances compound at rates that typically run well above 20% annually. The parent loan carries 0%, making the high-rate debt the financially urgent move.

Modern Alternatives: SECURE Act 2.0

Instead of a “bank of mom and dad” loan, parents can now guide children toward provisions in the [SECURE Act 2.0](https://www.google.com/search?q=https://www.finance.senate.gov/chairmans-news/summary-of-the-secure-20-act-of-2022). For “unforeseeable or immediate financial needs,” individuals may now be eligible for penalty-free emergency withdrawals of up to $1,000 from their own retirement accounts. This provides a path to liquidity that preserves the child’s financial autonomy without creating intergenerational debt.

The Illiquidity Trap in Multi-Generational Housing

While Megan’s case involves a car, these dynamics are increasingly common in housing. Using family capital for home improvements or down payments creates **Asset Illiquidity**, where the parent’s money is trapped until the house is sold. This creates a “financial entanglement” that lasts much longer than a standard personal loan and complicates the exit strategy for both parties.

Megan’s Plan, and What Her Parents Should Know

Megan’s immediate action is clear: build income aggressively, eliminate the credit card balance first, then pay her parents in full as quickly as possible. She should tell her parents the plan explicitly, including the timeline. Naming the repayment date removes the ambient guilt that poisons every conversation.

The deeper lesson is for parents. If you want to help your child and have the means, give the money without conditions. If you cannot afford to give it, say so directly. Using formalizing tools like [FamZoo](https://famzoo.com) can help track these as educational tools rather than high-stakes burdens. If a loan is already poisoning a relationship, parents should consider “forgiving” the debt as a one-time inheritance advancement to clear the air. The relationship is always worth more than the loan.

Editor’s Note: This article has been updated to include a comparison between the debt snowball and debt avalanche methods, information on penalty-free emergency withdrawals under the SECURE Act 2.0, an analysis of asset illiquidity in multi-generational housing, and strategies for formalizing or forgiving family financial support.

Photo of Carl Sullivan
About the Author Carl Sullivan →

Carl Sullivan has been a Flywheel Publishing contributor since 2020, focusing mostly on personal finance, investing and technology. He started his journalism career covering mutual funds, banking and business regulation.

Besides his freelance writing, Carl is a long-time manager of editorial teams covering a variety of topics including news, business and politics. He’s currently the North America Managing Editor for Flipboard and worked previously for Microsoft News and Newsweek.

Carl loves exploring the world and lived in India for several years. Today, he resides in New York City’s Queens borough, where you can hear hundreds of different languages just by riding the subway.

Featured Reads

Our top personal finance-related articles today. Your wallet will thank you later.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

ENPH Vol: 10,924,743
RL Vol: 1,126,140
IBM
IBM Vol: 15,174,002
WSM Vol: 1,276,415
STX Vol: 2,181,504

Top Losing Stocks

INTU Vol: 16,932,747
CTRA Vol: 73,319,495
WMT Vol: 35,892,512
CMI Vol: 772,798
WDAY Vol: 3,206,148