Dave Ramsey has spent years telling listeners that the conventional wisdom on Social Security is wrong. His position: claim at 62, the earliest age you can, and invest every check. “It usually makes sense to take it earlier and invest it,” he has argued on his show, calling the program a “mathematical disaster” he wants out of as fast as possible.
Almost every retirement planner disagrees. The Social Security Administration mechanically increases your monthly check by about 8% for each year you delay claiming up to age 70, and reduces it by up to 30% if you claim at 62. Locking in that reduced benefit is permanent, with no ability to revise the decision later.
The verdict: right answer, wrong reason
Ramsey is probably right that most Americans should claim early. His reasoning, that you will beat the system by investing the checks, does not hold up under scrutiny.
The 8% annual increase from delaying is a guaranteed, government-backed return on a stream of payments that lasts your entire life and partially adjusts for inflation. Historical stock returns of 7% to 10% annually are an average across decades, not a guarantee in any given year. On a risk-adjusted basis, a guaranteed 8% beats an expected 8% almost every time. If you have the cash flow to delay and you live to a normal life expectancy, waiting wins.
Here is the break-even math Ramsey skips. Imagine your full retirement age benefit at 67 is $2,000 a month. Claim at 62 and the check drops to roughly $1,400. Wait until 70 and it grows to about $2,480. Over a year, that works out to $16,800 at 62 versus $29,760 at 70, a gap of nearly $13,000 every single year, for life. The break-even point where the delayed claimer catches up in total dollars received sits around age 80 to 82. Live past that, and waiting was the better financial trade. Real-world SSA data from December 2025 underscores the stakes: the average monthly payment for new 62-year-old claimants was $1,335, while new claimants starting at 67 received an average of about $2,521. That nearly $1,200 monthly gap compounds over a long retirement.
Remaining life expectancy at age 65 is now about 19.7 years, according to CDC 2024 final mortality data, which puts the average 65-year-old comfortably past the break-even line. So why is Ramsey’s advice still probably right for most people? Because most people are not making this decision from a position of strength.
The variable that decides it: when you actually stop working
The break-even math assumes you have a paycheck or enough savings to bridge the gap from 62 to 70. Most Americans do not.
According to the EBRI’s 2026 Retirement Confidence Survey, the median actual retirement age in the United States is 62, even though workers typically expect to retire closer to 65. The savings cushion for that group is thin. Fidelity’s Q1 2026 data, drawn from 26,800 plans covering 25.6 million participants, shows the average 401(k) balance for workers aged 60 to 64 is $257,400, with median balances far lower. As a practical benchmark, Fidelity recommends having eight times your annual salary saved by age 60. For a household earning $75,000, that benchmark is $600,000, well beyond what most near-retirees have set aside.
The picture is complicated further by a notable trend. The share of new Social Security beneficiaries claiming at 62 has actually been falling for two decades, dropping from a peak of more than 60% in the 1990s to about 26% in 2024, the lowest level in at least 40 years, according to an Investopedia analysis of SSA data. That said, claims surged roughly 11% in 2025, as some Americans rushed to file amid uncertainty about the program’s future and staffing reductions at the Social Security Administration. Separately, a 2024 Census Bureau report found that 42% of older Americans rely on Social Security for half or more of their income, which clarifies just how little cushion most households carry into retirement.
Adding urgency to the whole calculation: the Social Security trust fund is now projected to face depletion around 2032, at which point payroll taxes would cover only about three-quarters of scheduled benefits, implying an across-the-board reduction of roughly 23% without congressional action.
Run the variable two ways. If you have a pension, strong savings, or part-time income that covers your bills from 62 to 70, delaying earns you that extra $13,000-a-year check for the rest of your life. If you stop working at 62 with $250,000 in a 401(k) and no pension, drawing down savings to delay Social Security means burning through your nest egg faster, exposing you to sequence-of-returns risk in a bad market, and leaving you with less flexibility for medical bills. In that case, claiming early stabilizes cash flow when you need it most.
That is the real case for Ramsey’s verdict, even if the “invest the check” rationale is shaky. The right answer, for most Americans, is “claim early because you have to.”
What to do before you file
Three concrete steps before you make the call:
- Pull your personalized benefit estimates at SSA.gov for ages 62, 67, and 70. The percentages above are averages. Your numbers are specific to your earnings record.
- Add up every income source available between 62 and 70: pension, part-time work, spouse’s income, taxable savings. If the total covers your essential bills without touching tax-advantaged accounts, delaying is on the table.
- Calculate your personal break-even age using your real benefit numbers. If your family health history and current health put you well past it, the math favors waiting. If not, claim when the paycheck stops.
Ramsey’s advice fits the country Americans actually live in, where retirement often arrives before the savings do. The math behind his conclusion is sound. The math he uses to defend it is not.
Editor’s note: This article updates the share of new Social Security recipients claiming at age 62 to 26% (2024 SSA data), corrects the average 401(k) balance for workers aged 60 to 64 to $257,400 (Fidelity Q1 2026), updates remaining life expectancy at 65 to 19.7 years (CDC 2024), and adds context on the 2025 claims surge and the revised Social Security trust fund depletion projection of 2032.
Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.
Top Gaining Stocks
Top Losing Stocks