The $2 Trillion Underwriting Case: Inside Chamath’s Blockbuster SpaceX Math

Photo of David Beren
By David Beren Published

Quick Read

  • Rocket Lab (RKLB) trades at a 74x forward price-to-sales multiple on a $74.6B market cap and $679.6M in trailing annual revenue, driven by a record $2.2B backlog and selection for the Space Force’s Golden Dome contract. Tesla (TSLA) invested $2B in SpaceX equity and disclosed a chip fab partnership, trading at a 16x price-to-sales ratio on $1.60T market cap. NVIDIA (NVDA) generated $81.6B in Q1 FY2027 revenue, up 85% year over year, with data center revenue of $75.25B, providing a template for infrastructure compounding valuations.

  • Chamath Palihapitiya anchors SpaceX’s $2 trillion valuation to a 20x revenue multiple by treating it as primarily a terrestrial data center opportunity, with Starlink and Starship as upside, while Rocket Lab’s 74x multiple suggests that SpaceX’s 20x multiple is defensible if the company achieves its revenue expansion targets.

  • The analyst who called NVIDIA in 2010 just named his top 10 AI stocks. Get them here FREE.

The $2 Trillion Underwriting Case: Inside Chamath’s Blockbuster SpaceX Math

© 24/7 Wall St.

During a highly anticipated segment on the latest All-In Podcast, Chamath Palihapitiya laid out a detailed underwriting case to justify why SpaceX is worth a full two trillion dollars right now. He explained that a twenty-times sales multiple is actually a bargain when you properly measure it against the massive commercial markets that Starlink and Starship are preparing to unlock. This structural framework points to an $18 billion revenue print last year and a clear path toward thirty billion this year, boosted by new orbital computing platforms.

The 20x Revenue Math

When you break down Chamath’s valuation framework, his underwriting model effectively anchors the long-term forward multiple directly to a single exploding infrastructure business line. He chooses to peg his numbers strictly to the massive revenue potential of the terrestrial data center opportunity, treating launch services, consumer Starlink subscriptions, defense contracts, and future orbital space-compute capabilities as pure valuation upside. This aggressive thesis becomes much easier to underwrite when you look at the company’s official S-1 prospectus data. The filing shows that the Connectivity segment generated $11,387 million of revenue in 2025 alongside a powerful expansion in core profitability metrics. Looking closely at the initial three months ended March 31, 2026, the digital infrastructure side of the business had already banked a stellar $3,257 million in baseline segment revenue.

Chamath explicitly frames Starlink as the most fundamentally important internet infrastructure project to emerge since the creation of the web itself. He projects that the terrestrial data center footprint alone can scale to generate hundreds of billions in annual run-rate revenue over the next decade. If even the lower threshold of that operational expansion materializes for the company, the steep initial multiple compresses down to a low single-digit forward number.

Rocket Lab: The Public Company That Trades Richer

When you look across the public markets for a pure-play aerospace comparison, Rocket Lab (NASDAQ:RKLB | RKLB Price Prediction) stands out as the cleanest analog, and the resulting multiple gap between the two companies is incredibly striking. Rocket Lab currently carries a $74.6 billion market cap against $679.6 million in trailing twelve-month revenue, pushing its trailing price-to-sales ratio to 110x and its enterprise-value-to-revenue multiple to 107x. Seeking Alpha estimates their forward revenue multiple at 74x after shares climbed 95% year to date through May 22, driven by a record $2.2 billion backlog and its high-profile selection for the Space Force’s Golden Dome space-based interceptor contract alongside Raytheon. CEO Peter Beck noted on the latest call that “Rocket Lab has delivered another exceptional quarter with record financial performance of more than $200 million in revenue.” If the public market is fully comfortable paying 74x forward sales for the clear number-two launcher, paying 20x for the market leader looks incredibly defensible.

Tesla: The Public Proxy With Direct Equity Exposure


Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) carries a $1.60 trillion market cap on $97.9 billion of trailing revenue, a 16x price-to-sales ratio, and a forward P/E of 204. Tesla disclosed a $2 billion investment in SpaceX equity in its Q1 FY2026 results, plus a partnership to build a vertically integrated chip fab. Shares are down 5% year to date but up 25% over one year. Reddit chatter reflects the cross-current: an r/stocks thread titled “SpaceX IPO Overpriced?” pulled 273 upvotes and 329 comments by May 22, suggesting retail is wrestling with the same multiple question Chamath is answering.

The NVIDIA Parallel

NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA) provides the template for what infrastructure compounding looks like in real time. Q1 FY2027 revenue hit $81.6 billion, up 85% year over year, with Data Center revenue of $75.25 billion. Chamath’s view is that Jensen Huang needs a partner capable of DC-to-DC power transformation at data center scale, and Musk is probably the only one, with in-space data centers roughly three years out. NVIDIA shares are up 15% year to date and 62% over one year, validating that infrastructure-of-the-future narratives can support multiples that look extreme on a trailing basis.

What Investors Should Watch

Understanding the broader takeaway from Chamath’s financial modeling is much more directional than absolute. He calls this “the beginning of the beginning” and frames SpaceX’s massive technical edge as a permanent capital moat that continuously compounds into a ruthless technology and execution advantage. Public market investors can gain thematic exposure through pure-play aerospace names like Rocket Lab or big tech compute partners like NVIDIA. Watching the upcoming SpaceX IPO timeline, the ongoing Starship launch cadence, and global Starlink ARPU stabilization will tell you exactly whether that premium forward multiple compresses.

Photo of David Beren
About the Author David Beren →

David Beren has been a Flywheel Publishing contributor since 2022. Writing for 24/7 Wall St. since 2023, David loves to write about topics of all shapes and sizes. As a technology expert, David focuses heavily on consumer electronics brands, automobiles, and general technology. He has previously written for LifeWire, formerly About.com. As a part-time freelance writer, David’s “day job” has been working on and leading social media for multiple Fortune 100 brands. David loves the flexibility of this field and its ability to reach customers exactly where they like to spend their time. Additionally, David previously published his own blog, TmoNews.com, which reached 3 million readers in its first year. In addition to freelance and social media work, David loves to spend time with his family and children and relive the glory days of video game consoles by playing any retro game console he can get his hands on.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

DELL Vol: 15,291,396
HP
HPQ Vol: 48,674,188
NTAP Vol: 6,668,169
SWKS Vol: 5,338,626
EL Vol: 8,107,759

Top Losing Stocks

CTRA Vol: 73,319,495
COIN Vol: 7,927,507
TTWO Vol: 7,048,109
UHS Vol: 1,236,515
CHTR Vol: 2,101,059