HEICO Has the Better Business, the Better Balance Sheet, and a Price That Makes It Impossible to Buy

A $90,000 bag of screws reveals the brutal gap between how HEICO and TransDigm squeeze profit from the same captive market, but the company with the cleaner books and stronger moat carries a price that punishes anyone who buys it…

Published October 5, 2026, 10:40am ET · 3 min read

This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.

A male engineer in a blue uniform stands in an aerospace hangar, looking intently at a digital tablet he holds in both hands. Behind him, a large white passenger airplane is undergoing maintenance, surrounded by multi-tiered metal scaffolding. One of the plane's engines features an exposed orange cowling, and the blue and white tail section is visible in the background next to a sign that reads "BAY 2". The hangar is brightly lit with overhead industrial lights, giving the scene a cool, professional tone.
An engineer oversees maintenance on a commercial aircraft, symbolizing the critical aftermarket services and technological advancements driving companies in the aerospace sector. © gorodenkoff / iStock via Getty Images

When a retirement-focused investor considers HEICO (NYSE:HEI | HEI Price Prediction) against TransDigm (NYSE:TDG), the key differences come down to pricing strategy, balance sheet strength, and valuation. A small bag of airline screws priced at $90,000 shows the pricing power at stake. The aftermarket covers replacement parts and repairs sold after a plane is delivered. These two companies use that power in opposite ways.

Pricing Power: TransDigm Earns More, HEICO Keeps It Longer

TransDigm aims to be the sole source for a part, with no approved alternative. About 90% of its net sales come from proprietary products. HEICO wins FAA approval for replacement parts certified as equivalent to the original, and deliberately prices them 30% to 50% below the original equipment manufacturer (OEM). Airlines prefer HEICO, and Lufthansa owns a stake in part of HEICO’s aftermarket business.

TransDigm’s approach yields wider margins. Its trailing operating margin is 46%, versus 25.1% at HEICO. The weakness: squeezing customers invites scrutiny when the Pentagon is among them. TransDigm returned $16 million in excess profits to the Pentagon, setting a precedent.

More recently, TransDigm walked away from its Stellant Systems deal in mid-July after the Justice Department said it would challenge it. The risk is that the better a target fits TransDigm’s sole-source criteria, the more likely regulators see reduced competition, threatening the acquisition engine the model depends on. Winner: HEICO.

Balance Sheet: HEICO Wins Without Contest

Book value per share is what each share would be worth after subtracting liabilities from assets. It is $35.40 at HEICO and negative $167.97 at TransDigm. A profitable company can end up with negative book value after years of borrowing to buy businesses and fund payouts. That includes a $90-per-share special dividend in fiscal 2025, paid for with $5.0 billion of new debt. Quarterly interest expense reached $514 million, up from $397 million. Negative equity also makes TransDigm’s return on equity undefined, showing as 0. That is a quirk of the math, since the company still earned $540 million last quarter.

TransDigm’s net debt stands at about $31 billion, or leverage of around 5.8 times. HEICO has $2.3 billion of net debt and leverage of around 1.6 times. Insiders own up to 22% of HEICO and 3% of TransDigm. High insider ownership aligns management incentives with those of long-term shareholders. Winner: HEICO.

Valuation: TransDigm Is the Stock Priced for New Money

HEICO trades at 51 times trailing earnings and 43 times forward earnings. TransDigm trades at 33 and 23, respectively. EV/EBITDA compares total value, including debt, with operating earnings before interest, taxes, and non-cash charges. HEICO trades at 26.58x versus 18.18x for TransDigm. HEICO commands that premium despite having a smaller market cap ($35.9 billion) than TransDigm ($60.5 billion). The market has already paid for HEICO’s quality.

TransDigm’s discount reflects market concerns. Shares are down 19.5% year to date, compared with 7.8% for HEICO, as the market prices in debt and regulatory risk. Analysts’ consensus price targets are $1,484.37 for TransDigm and $393.70 for HEICO. From opening prices of $1,087.00 and $301.73, respectively, that implies upside of about 36.6% and 30.5%. Winner: TransDigm.

HEI analyst ratings
HEI price target

TDG analyst ratings
TDG price target

Verdict: HEICO Is the Long-Term Holding, TransDigm the Better Price

Investors looking for income will find little here. HEICO pays $0.13 twice a year. That is its 95th consecutive semiannual dividend, but the yield is tiny. TransDigm pays no regular dividend, only occasional special dividends funded with debt.

HEICO has the profile of a multi-decade compounder. It has the more durable moat, the cleaner balance sheet, and owners whose interests align with shareholders’. Its 125.5% five-year gain beats TransDigm’s 69.7%. At 51 times earnings, though, new money is paying for all of that up front.

For conservative retirees, HEICO’s valuation is the main hurdle. Investors comfortable with 5.8 times leverage get TransDigm’s 13% organic growth and its buyback capacity at a far lower multiple. Two things would change the conclusion: a meaningful drop in HEICO’s multiple, or clarity on whether TransDigm’s acquisition pipeline can clear antitrust regulators.

 

Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.

Trey Thoelcke

Trey has been an editor and author at 24/7 Wall St. for more than a decade, where he has published thousands of articles analyzing corporate earnings, dividend stocks, short interest, insider buying, private equity, and market trends. His comprehensive coverage spans the full spectrum of financial markets, from blue-chip stalwarts to emerging growth companies.
Beyond 24/7 Wall St., Trey has created and edited financial content for Benzinga and AOL's BloggingStocks, contributing additional hundreds of articles to the investment community.
Trey's editorial expertise extends across multiple publishing environments. He served as production editor at Dearborn Financial Publishing and development editor at Kaplan, where he helped shape financial education materials. Earlier in his career, he worked as a writer-producer at SVE. His freelance editing portfolio includes work for prestigious clients such as Sage Publications, Rand McNally, the Institute for Supply Management, the American Library Association, Eggplant Literary Productions, and Spiegel.
Outside of financial journalism, Trey writes fiction and has been an active member of the writing community for years, moderating workshop sessions at regional conventions.

All articles →