Who Benefits Most from Taking Social Security at 62? Dave Ramsey Breaks It Down

Photo of 247staff
By 247staff Updated Published

Key Points

  • Taking Social Security at 62 allows you to invest the funds in index funds or stocks, potentially generating greater returns than waiting until 70 for a larger monthly benefit, though this strategy triggers earnings test penalties if you continue working and introduces sequence of returns risk.

  • Claiming early provides flexibility to access cash for unexpected expenses and pursue investments during market downturns, but permanently reduces your monthly benefit and caps survivor benefits for your spouse, whereas delaying past Full Retirement Age guarantees an 8% annual increase until age 70.

  • Are you ahead, or behind on retirement? SmartAsset's free tool can match you with a financial advisor in minutes to help you answer that today. Each advisor has been carefully vetted, and must act in your best interests. Don't waste another minute; learn more here.

This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.
Who Benefits Most from Taking Social Security at 62? Dave Ramsey Breaks It Down

© Anna Webber | Getty Images

I do not always agree with the advice Dave Ramsey gives on his show. Many financial situations are complex, and there is rarely a single magic solution that a professional can offer. Opinions and viewpoints will always show through, and it is perfectly fine not to see eye to eye with any pundit on every topic. Still, there is one potentially controversial Ramsey viewpoint that I fully support, and that is taking Social Security at 62, which is the earliest age you can file.

Delayed gratification is often a smart financial choice. If you wait beyond 62, your monthly Social Security benefit will be higher. But the value you get from that money at different stages of your life is not the same. The utility, meaning the enjoyment or satisfaction you gain, might be significantly greater in your early 60s, even if the amount is smaller. For many people, spending a modest benefit earlier can deliver far more life value than waiting for a larger check later.

Taking social security sooner rather than later? Why it can make more sense than delaying.

Social Security Infographic

24/7 Wall St.

If you are in good health, there is a strong argument for taking the money sooner rather than later, especially since unexpected health issues become more likely as you age. If you can travel and enjoy a wide range of activities in your early 60s, it can make sense to collect a smaller benefit now rather than wait for a larger one later.

The time value of money may also work more in your favor at age 62 than you might expect. Even so, the decision to claim Social Security early is very personal, and the right choice depends heavily on your unique circumstances. Many people who reach 62 today may live well into their late 80s or 90s, and if you are confident that your health will hold up, delaying benefits can still be a sensible option.

Either way, you have meaningful flexibility. You can choose to file or wait, year by year, based on your needs, preferences, or any sudden changes in your life.

Now, let’s return to Dave Ramsey and explore why he believes taking Social Security at 62 can be a smart move. In this piece, we will outline several reasons that support the case for collecting earlier rather than later.

Take the money and invest it!

Claiming Age Monthly Benefit (as % of FRA Benefit) Pros Cons
62 70% – Receive benefits early
– Can use income if retiring early
– Reduced monthly benefit for life
– May not maximize lifetime benefits if you live long
FRA (66-67 depending on birth year) 100% – Full monthly benefit
– No reduction for early claiming
– No early access to funds
– Lower than benefits at age 70
70 124% – Maximized monthly benefit
– Ideal for those with longer life expectancy
– Delay in receiving benefits
– May not be optimal for those with shorter life expectancy

Even if you don’t need extra cash today to support your lifestyle, you can take the cash today and invest it in a way that may just bag you a greater return over the long haul. Even if you expect to live to 100, taking the cash at 62 and investing it wisely can not only literally pay huge dividends, but it may just put you on the fast track to a more comfortable retirement.

Additionally, having the cash on hand allows you greater flexibility to change up the budget should unforeseen financial costs hit from out of nowhere. Ramsey thinks retirees should factor in flexibility as a part of their decision regarding when they start taking social security payments.

Either way, having some extra cash to invest in solid blue chips, I believe, makes a lot of sense, especially if you have a chance to deploy the funds on bargains after sharp market sell-offs. Just think of the opportunity that extra cash would allow you if a 2020 stock market crash and ensuing V-shaped recovery were to happen again.

Even if you’re not looking to buy stocks in times of extreme undervaluation, stashing the funds in a simple, low-cost index fund may suffice. Ramsey thinks that early social security payments invested in a “good mutual fund” could score better results than someone who waits until 70 before collecting.

However, implementing this strategy while continuing to work triggers strict regulatory penalties. For 2026, the Social Security Administration enforces an earnings test threshold of $24,480 for beneficiaries under Full Retirement Age, clawing back $1 in benefits for every $2 earned above the limit. Furthermore, early filers face a three-year healthcare funding gap before Medicare eligibility begins at age 65, with standard Part B premiums rising to $202.90 per month in 2026.

Relying purely on market investments also introduces significant sequence of returns risk, where an early market downturn can permanently impair a portfolio while the retiree remains locked into a permanently reduced baseline benefit. This individual investment math further overlooks critical household dynamics, as filing at 62 permanently caps potential survivor benefits for a remaining spouse. Conversely, delaying claims past Full Retirement Age provides a guaranteed, inflation-indexed increase of approximately 8% per year up to age 70, establishing a risk-free return benchmark that market-based strategies rarely match consistently.

In short, Ramsey’s in the camp of taking social security early. If you value investment opportunities and financial flexibility, and, perhaps most importantly, you can stomach the risk that comes with investing your social security funds in markets, perhaps taking social security at 62 makes sense for you.

The bottom line

As with most topics in personal finance, there is no right or one-size-fits-all solution. So, don’t take the advice of Dave Ramsey without putting on your own homework and meeting with a financial advisor who can better grasp your situation, concerns, and ambitions.

If you want more cash to invest through your 60s and value flexibility, maybe Ramsey’s advice of taking social security at 62 is one of the most brilliant pieces of advice he’s given!


Editor’s Note: This article has been updated to incorporate the 2026 Social Security Administration earnings test thresholds, updated 2026 Medicare Part B premium data, and an analysis of the sequence of returns risk, healthcare coverage gaps, spousal survivor benefit impacts, and guaranteed delayed retirement credits.

Photo of 247staff
About the Author 247staff →

Featured Reads

Our top personal finance-related articles today. Your wallet will thank you later.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

ENPH Vol: 18,284,121
RL Vol: 2,116,734
IBM
IBM Vol: 25,702,926
STX Vol: 3,479,289
WSM Vol: 2,603,044

Top Losing Stocks

INTU Vol: 22,328,680
CTRA Vol: 73,319,495
WMT Vol: 52,981,181
DE Vol: 3,212,338
VLO Vol: 3,610,226