The value-over-growth rotation that strategists had been calling for since the start of the year is finally showing up in fund returns. Through mid-May, large-cap value indexes are running ahead of several large-cap growth peers for the first sustained stretch in years, and the three cleanest vehicles for capturing it are Vanguard S&P 500 Value Index Fund ETF Shares (NYSEARCA:VOOV | VOOV Price Prediction), SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (NYSEARCA:SPYV), and iShares S&P 500 Value ETF (NYSEARCA:IVE).
All three track variants of the S&P 500 Value Index, screening the same 500 companies on book-to-price, earnings-to-price, and sales-to-price ratios. The differences sit in cost, scale, and small methodology quirks that compound over years. Most investors are still parked in growth funds and looking the other way, which is exactly what makes the setup interesting.
Why Value Is Working in 2026
The backdrop is straightforward. Mega-cap growth concentration has loosened, the energy and financials weight inside value indexes is paying off as rates stay higher for longer, and earnings revisions for traditional cyclicals have held up better than for unprofitable tech. WisdomTree’s research desk described early 2026 as a sharp rotation into value followed by a growth rebound in late April, which is consistent with what these three funds have delivered.
Year to date, VOOV is up about 6%, SPYV is up roughly 6%, and IVE is up around 6%. Over the trailing year, each has returned close to 19%, which has quietly beaten several pure growth ETFs that loaded up on the same handful of AI names. That is the headline most investors have missed.
VOOV: The Vanguard Workhorse
VOOV is the cleanest expression of the S&P 500 Value Index for investors who want Vanguard’s structure and tax efficiency. The fund charges an expense ratio of 0.08% and manages about $5.8 billion in net assets, which is large enough for tight spreads but smaller than its iShares competitor.
What surprises people about VOOV’s portfolio is how much technology sits inside it. Information technology is the top sector at 24% of the fund, followed by financials at 17% and health care at 14%. The S&P methodology splits some mega-cap names across both the growth and value indexes when their valuation signals are mixed, so VOOV ends up owning slices of Apple and Microsoft alongside Exxon Mobil and JPMorgan. That blending is why VOOV has tracked closer to the broader S&P 500 in recent years than purer deep-value funds have.
The 30-day SEC yield sits modestly above the S&P 500 itself. For a long-term core allocation, VOOV is the option that asks the fewest questions: low cost, deep liquidity, Vanguard’s patient indexing operation behind it. The tradeoff is that its tech weight means it will not protect you in a true value-rally-with-tech-selloff scenario the way a strict deep-value fund would.
SPYV: The Cheapest Way In
SPYV is the cost leader of the group at an expense ratio of 0.04%, half of what VOOV charges and less than a quarter of what IVE charges. For an index product where every issuer is buying the same basket, that fee gap compounds into meaningful dollars over a 20-year hold.
The portfolio profile differs slightly from VOOV in ways that matter for the rotation thesis. Information technology is still the largest sector at 17%, but financials at 16%, industrials at 11%, and energy at 8% are all heavier than in VOOV. That gives SPYV more of the cyclical tilt that has been driving value’s outperformance this year. Top holdings include Apple at about 7%, Amazon at 4%, Exxon Mobil at 3%, and Walmart at 2%.
The dividend yield comes in around 1.9%, the highest of the three, which reflects that heavier energy and consumer staples weight. For an investor running the value rotation on a cost-sensitive basis, SPYV is the strongest pick on the list. The tradeoff: SPYV trades at a lower per-share price near $60, which is fine in most brokerages but can introduce minor rounding friction in dollar-based dividend reinvestment plans.
IVE: The Liquidity Choice With a Cost Penalty
IVE is the oldest of the three, launched by iShares more than two decades ago, and it remains the deepest-liquidity option for institutions running large trades. The portfolio is essentially the same S&P 500 Value basket. The problem is the expense ratio, which is more than double VOOV and more than four times SPYV.
For a fund that holds the same index constituents as its cheaper competitors, that fee differential is hard to defend on cost alone. Where IVE earns its place on this list is in execution. Its daily trading volume is deep, options markets are active, and the bid-ask spread is consistently tight even in stressed conditions. For investors who plan to trade in size, write covered calls against the position, or use the ETF inside more complex structures, that depth is worth paying for.
The 30-day SEC yield on IVE is in line with VOOV. Performance has tracked the index closely. The tradeoff is exactly what it looks like: you pay a fee premium for liquidity and brand familiarity that most buy-and-hold retail investors will never use.
Picking Between the Three
The decision framework is shorter than the list of similarities suggests. For cost-focused long-term holders, SPYV is the most efficient default. Its 0.04% expense ratio, slightly heavier cyclical tilt, and higher dividend yield make it the strongest expression of the value-rotation thesis for most retail investors.
Investors who already run their core portfolio at Vanguard, or who value the firm’s index-management culture, will be perfectly served by VOOV. The fee gap to SPYV is real but small in absolute terms, and the operational simplicity of keeping a single issuer matters more than four basis points for many households.
IVE is the institutional and options-trader pick. If you are not using its liquidity advantage, you are paying for something you do not need. The bigger question for all three is whether the value-over-growth rotation extends through the back half of 2026 or reverses as it did briefly in April. Earnings breadth in financials and energy, plus the trajectory of long-end rates, will decide that. Sector earnings revisions are the signal worth tracking.
Top Gaining Stocks
Top Losing Stocks