ETF

XLK Does Not Own Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, Netflix or Tesla. Three Stocks Are 35.87% of It

Millions of investors bought XLK expecting broad exposure to the companies reshaping the economy, but a closer look at its SEC filing reveals several of the most recognizable names in tech are nowhere inside it, and the ones that are…

Published October 6, 2026, 6:33pm ET · 4 min read

The ETF Examiner desk. Editor: Ryne Mauck.

This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.

A man and a woman are seated on a brown leather couch, focused on a silver laptop on a wooden coffee table. The man, wearing a grey sweater, points at the laptop screen with a thoughtful expression, while the woman, dressed in a yellow sweater, holds a white mug and looks concerned. A bright orange knitted blanket is draped over the couch. A teal mug is on the coffee table, and a window showing residential houses in the background lets in bright sunlight.
A couple intently reviews financial data on their laptop, reflecting the serious consideration investors give to their portfolios, especially when dealing with specific ETFs like XLK. © 24/7 Wall St.

If you bought a popular tech sector ETF for broad technology exposure, open its most recent SEC portfolio filing. As of June 30, 2026, the State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (NYSEARCA:XLK) held no shares of Alphabet, Amazon, Meta Platforms, Netflix, or Tesla. In the same filing, NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA | NVDA Price Prediction), Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) and Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) made up 35.87% of the fund. The ten largest positions came to 64.45%.

That gap between what’s missing and what dominates is the fund’s main limitation for investors seeking broad tech exposure. The word “technology” on the label covers a much narrower and more concentrated piece of the market than most buyers expect.

What Your Technology Fund Actually Holds

The filing lists 74 equity positions supporting about $123.9 billion in net assets. NVIDIA led at 14.65%, Apple came next at 12.85%, and Microsoft held 8.38%. Three more chip companies each had more than 5%, and chip equipment suppliers took up most of the other top-ten spots. At the other end, dozens of positions each made up less than 0.5% of assets.

So investors expecting broad exposure to the tech economy own a portfolio driven by a small group of semiconductor and hardware companies.

Why Alphabet and Amazon Fall Outside the Fund

XLK tracks a sector index built on the Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS). GICS assigns every public company to exactly one sector. It puts Alphabet, Meta, and Netflix in Communication Services and Amazon and Tesla in Consumer Discretionary. XLK only holds companies classified as Information Technology.

GICS sorts companies by how they make money. Alphabet and Meta earn most of their revenue from advertising. Amazon’s classification follows its retail operations, and Tesla’s follows its vehicle manufacturing business. That means a highly technological business can still end up in a different sector.

All of this is disclosed and standard practice. The classification is public, and the fund follows its index. The cost comes from a common habit: few buyers read the sector definition before they buy a sector fund.

Concentration Risk Behind a Sector Label

When several of the biggest tech-adjacent companies are left out, the giants that remain carry more weight. With 74 stocks and 35.87% of assets in just three of them, XLK’s results depend heavily on NVIDIA, Apple, and Microsoft. A prolonged decline in any one of them could move the whole fund more than its name suggests.

That concentration has paid off recently. XLK gained 41.07% over the year ending October 5, 2026. Concentration amplifies losses as well as gains, and a retiree who draws income from a portfolio feels the losses more. Investors who want AI exposure without piling further into the same three chip and hardware names have options beyond the semiconductor sector (we covered seven of them, from power to cooling to networking, in a free report you can grab here).

Overlap You May Already Own

XLK won’t give you either Alphabet or Amazon. Adding an S&P 500 fund changes the math in a way many investors miss. The broad fund already owns those companies at market weight, so XLK on top mostly adds more NVIDIA, Apple, and Microsoft to a portfolio that already holds them.

It works the other way too. If you already own large stakes in any of those three companies directly, buying XLK could double your exposure.

A Broader Tech ETF Includes Alphabet and Meta

The iShares U.S. Technology ETF (NYSEARCA:IYW) tracks the Russell 1000 Technology RIC 22.5/45 Capped Index, which classifies companies differently. Its top holdings have included Alphabet and Meta Platforms. The Vanguard Information Technology ETF follows a GICS-based index. It leaves out the same companies XLK does. Check each issuer’s current factsheet for expense ratios and top-ten weights before you compare.

Who XLK Suits and What to Check First

XLK suits investors wanting concentrated exposure to the GICS Information Technology sector (chips, hardware, and enterprise software) and comfortable with a top-heavy portfolio. XLK is the wrong product for investors seeking broad technology exposure that includes the platforms most people call Big Tech.

Keep the dates in mind. These holdings come from the June 30, 2026 SEC filing. Weights change, and index providers review classifications from time to time, so a company can be moved to a different sector. Before you buy any sector fund, read the index methodology that defines the sector. That document tells you what you actually own.

Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.

Ryne Mauck

Ryne Mauck is an investment writer covering exchange-traded funds, retirement planning, and portfolio strategy. Through his work at 24/7 Wall St. and other investment platforms, including Seeking Alpha, he aims to provide clear, research-driven insights that help investors make more informed decisions while maintaining a long-term approach to investing.

Ryne holds a B.Sc. in Finance and an M.A. in Political Science. He is a formerly registered Municipal Advisor Representative and has passed the Series 50, Series 63, and Series 65 exams. His articles are not intended to be, nor should they be interpreted as, financial advice.

All articles →