Suze Orman: Why the 4% Rule No Longer Works for Today’s Retirees

Photo of Maurie Backman
By Maurie Backman Updated Published

Key Points

  • Suze Orman recommends a 3% withdrawal rate for retirees instead of the traditional 4% rule, citing longer lifespans, unpredictable markets, and changed interest rate environments that make the older strategy riskier for today’s retirees.

  • Modern retirement strategies like dynamic guardrails, income layering, SECURE 2.0 super catch-ups, and delaying Social Security to age 70 can help retirees bridge the income gap created by lower withdrawal rates while protecting their portfolio principal.

  • Are you ahead, or behind on retirement? SmartAsset's free tool can match you with a financial advisor in minutes to help you answer that today. Each advisor has been carefully vetted, and must act in your best interests. Don't waste another minute; learn more here.

This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.
Suze Orman: Why the 4% Rule No Longer Works for Today’s Retirees

© Leigh Vogel / Stringer / Getty Images North America

A lot of people reach retirement age without much money in savings. But if you worked hard and saved well, you may be in a very different position. And if you’re retiring with a respectable nest egg, it’s important to know how to manage it.

Many financial experts recommend using a strategy called the 4% rule. The rule has you withdrawing 4% of your savings balance your first year of retirement and adjusting future withdrawals for inflation.

It’s a strategy that, if all goes well, should be conducive to having your savings last for 30 years. But while a lot of financial insiders are fans of the 4% rule, Suze Orman is not.

Orman thinks the 4% rule no longer works for today’s retirees and recommends a different approach to managing savings.

Why Orman thinks the 4% rule is a problem

The 4% rule makes a number of assumptions that could render it less effective. It assumes a fairly even mix of stocks and bonds and certain market conditions. Orman thinks markets are unpredictable, interest rates aren’t what they were back when the 4% rule was established, and Americans are living longer. This combination makes the 4% rule a bit dangerous, in her opinion.

Orman therefore recommends starting with a 3% withdrawal rate, or even less, depending on how your portfolio is invested. For a retiree with $1 million in savings, this represents a drop from $40,000 to $30,000 in annual portfolio income—a significant gap that requires modern strategic planning to bridge.

An infographic contrasting the 4% retirement withdrawal rule with Suze Orman's recommendation of 3% or less, outlining the financial implications and coping strategies.

24/7 Wall St.

Modern strategies to cope with smaller withdrawals

One of the biggest fears you might have in retirement is that your money will eventually run out. To avoid this without sacrificing your quality of life, you can utilize new legislative and technical strategies.

Utilize SECURE 2.0 “Super Catch-Ups”

Orman recommends working longer to boost your nest egg. Under current tax laws, this is more effective than ever. The SECURE Act 2.0 now allows individuals aged 60 through 63 to make “super catch-up” contributions to their employer-sponsored plans. For 2025 and 2026, this allows for significantly higher tax-advantaged savings right before you cross the finish line, making those extra working years much more impactful.

Implement Dynamic Guardrails

Rather than sticking to a rigid 3% or 4% rate, many experts now suggest “Dynamic Guardrails.” This approach allows you to increase your withdrawal rate when markets are performing well but requires a pre-planned “belt-tightening” reduction if the portfolio drops below a specific floor. This flexibility often allows for a higher initial withdrawal than the strict 3% Orman suggests while maintaining safety.

Beware the IRMAA Surcharge

A major hidden threat to retirement income is the Income Related Monthly Adjustment Amount (IRMAA). If your withdrawals push your Modified Adjusted Gross Income over certain thresholds, your Medicare Part B and Part D premiums can skyrocket. Strategic withdrawal planning isn’t just about the percentage you take out; it’s about staying under these tax and surcharge brackets to preserve your cash flow.

Income Layering and Synthetic Dividends

Modern retirees are also moving toward “income layering.” This involves using a mix of Social Security, bond ladders, and options-based strategies—sometimes called synthetic dividends—to create a consistent floor of income. By generating cash flow through covered calls or other conservative strategies, you can meet your income needs without being forced to sell shares during a market downturn.

Maximizing Social Security

Orman remains a firm advocate of delaying Social Security until age 70. If your full retirement age is 67 and you wait until 70 to sign up, you boost your monthly payments by 24% permanently. This guaranteed, inflation-adjusted income is the ultimate hedge against a lower portfolio withdrawal rate.

It’s always a good idea to talk to a financial advisor about your specific situation. They can look at your portfolio makeup, your income needs, and current market conditions to help you design a tiered income plan that keeps your principal safe.

Editor’s Note: This article was updated to include information regarding SECURE Act 2.0 super catch-up provisions for retirees aged 60 to 63, the implementation of dynamic withdrawal guardrails, the impact of Medicare IRMAA surcharges on retirement cash flow, and the use of income layering and options-based strategies to supplement traditional portfolio withdrawals.

Photo of Maurie Backman
About the Author Maurie Backman →

Maurie Backman has more than a decade of experience writing about financial topics, including retirement, investing, Social Security, and real estate. Her work has appeared on sites that include The Motley Fool, USA Today, U.S. News & World Report, and CNN Underscored.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

DELL Vol: 15,291,396
HP
HPQ Vol: 48,674,188
NTAP Vol: 6,668,169
SWKS Vol: 5,338,626
EL Vol: 8,107,759

Top Losing Stocks

CTRA Vol: 73,319,495
COIN Vol: 7,927,507
TTWO Vol: 7,048,109
UHS Vol: 1,236,515
CHTR Vol: 2,101,059