You’re 61 with a portfolio in the low seven figures, eyeing retirement in a small Western town with a good fishing river. Livingston, Montana sits at the top of that list. The Yellowstone River runs through downtown, Paradise Valley and the Spring Creeks are a short drive south, and Yellowstone National Park is about an hour away. With $3.2 million invested, the answer is yes, you can do it comfortably, but only if you price the trout life honestly and understand the two or three things about Montana that subtly bend the budget.
What it actually costs to live in Livingston
Housing is the biggest line item. The median home in Park County sits around $575,000 in 2026, while properties with river frontage or acreage in Paradise Valley often move well beyond $800,000. Assume a retiree purchases a home for $650,000 in cash and avoids a mortgage payment altogether. Property taxes are relatively modest by national standards, typically running about $4,500 to $5,500 annually on a property of that value. Homeowners insurance has become more expensive as wildfire risk has increased across the West, making annual premiums closer to $2,800 than the levels many retirees remember from a decade ago.
The rest of the budget is comparatively manageable. Montana remains below the national average on most cost-of-living measures and imposes no state sales tax. A comfortable annual budget for a retired couple might include roughly $11,000 for groceries and household expenses, $4,200 for utilities and internet, $7,500 for vehicles and fuel, $9,000 for healthcare, $8,000 for home maintenance, $10,000 for travel and dining, and $12,000 for fishing, outdoor recreation, and guide services. Once property taxes, insurance, and taxes on portfolio withdrawals are included, total annual spending lands in the neighborhood of $95,000 to $100,000.
What the $3.2 million generates
At the 4.45% ten-year Treasury yield available now, a balanced 60/40 portfolio at a 4% withdrawal rate produces $128,000 a year before tax. Pull that down to 3.5% to protect a 30-plus year horizon and you have $112,000. Either covers the budget above with room. If one spouse claims Social Security at full retirement age for an average benefit near $24,000 annually, the portfolio only has to lift roughly $75,000, which is a 2.3% draw. That version almost certainly survives a bad sequence of returns in year three.
For an early retiree bridging to Medicare, build from a taxable brokerage and short Treasury ladder to manage modified AGI for ACA subsidy purposes. Once Medicare kicks in, Part B is $202.90 a month in 2026 with a $283 deductible, and a Medigap plus Part D combination in Montana runs roughly $250 to $350 a month per person. IRMAA surcharges do not bite until joint MAGI clears $218,000, so withdrawal planning keeps you out of them easily.
The fishing budget, priced honestly
The appeal of Livingston is access. The reality is that the best access often comes with a price tag. A full-day guided float on the Yellowstone, Madison, or nearby blue-ribbon rivers typically runs $700 to $1,000 or more for one or two anglers before gratuity. Private spring creeks such as DePuy’s, Armstrong’s, and Nelson’s charge rod fees that vary by season and availability, with prime summer dates often reserved months in advance.
Many retirees eventually buy their own boat. A used drift boat in solid condition typically costs $8,000 to $15,000, with additional expenses for maintenance, registration, equipment, and storage. For someone fishing 80 days a year through a mix of self-guided trips, walk-and-wade outings, and a dozen or more guided floats, an annual fishing budget of roughly $12,000 to $15,000 is realistic. That estimate is already included in the working budget above.
The thing most people miss
Three factors matter more to this retirement plan than the headline portfolio number.
First, trout fishing conditions are increasingly influenced by water temperatures. During particularly warm summers, Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks may impose hoot owl restrictions that prohibit fishing during the hottest part of the day to reduce stress on trout populations. In recent years, portions of the Yellowstone, Madison, and Gallatin systems have experienced periodic restrictions. Retirees who prioritize fishing often find the most consistent conditions during spring runoff windows and the cooler months of early summer and fall.
Second, property values across Montana have risen sharply over the past decade, with communities near Livingston and Paradise Valley benefiting from continued migration and spillover from the Bozeman market. Recent reappraisals increased taxable values for many homeowners, although Montana’s homestead provisions help reduce the burden on primary residences. Retirees planning to establish permanent residency should generally ensure they qualify for all available primary-residence benefits.
Third, Montana remains one of the few states that taxes at least some Social Security income, although deductions and exemptions reduce the impact for many retirees. The state also offers relatively competitive overall tax treatment and imposes no statewide sales tax. For retirees living on a combination of Social Security and portfolio withdrawals, state income taxes are typically manageable but should still be incorporated into the annual budget.
The number that makes it work
For a couple retiring to Livingston with a paid-off home purchased for roughly $650,000, a $3.2 million portfolio provides substantial room to support the lifestyle. At a 3.5% withdrawal rate, the portfolio generates about $112,000 annually before Social Security. Combined with retirement benefits, that income comfortably exceeds a realistic Livingston budget of roughly $95,000 to $100,000 per year, creating a meaningful margin for unexpected expenses and lifestyle flexibility.
That cushion matters. It helps absorb major home repairs, vehicle replacements, rising property taxes, guided fishing trips, and the occasional year when conditions push anglers toward other rivers or destinations. Retirees leaving the workforce before Medicare eligibility should plan carefully for healthcare coverage, and Montana homeowners should take advantage of available homestead benefits. The financial side of the equation is straightforward. The larger variable is often the river itself, which tends to dictate the schedule more than the portfolio does.