Is Intel or Micron More Dangerous for the Rest of 2026?

Photo of Alex Sirois
By Alex Sirois Published

Quick Read

  • INTC posted its strongest revenue growth in 15 years and MU guided to $50 billion next quarter, yet both stocks are sliding hard.

  • Intel's Foundry bled a $2.1 billion operating loss while Q3 non-GAAP EPS guidance of just $0.38 signals forward guidance compression arriving now.

  • Mehrotra's multi-year HBM4 agreements and 84.6% gross margins give Micron a credible AI memory business case through 2027's supply catch-up.

  • The most widely read finance newsletter on Substack isn't published by a bank, it's Doomberg, where 383,000+ readers get the energy and macro analysis the mainstream press misses. 24/7 Wall St. readers save 17% on their first year here.

This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.
Is Intel or Micron More Dangerous for the Rest of 2026?

© Shutterstock

Intel (NASDAQ:INTC | INTC Price Prediction) and Micron Technology (NASDAQ:MU) both delivered blockbuster quarters, yet their stocks are now sliding fast. Intel posted its strongest revenue growth in more than fifteen years. Micron reported $41.46 billion in quarterly revenue. The question for the back half of 2026 is which chipmaker is actually more dangerous to hold.

One Rode AI Memory. The Other Rebuilt a Foundry.

Micron is running on pure memory pricing power. Cloud Memory brought in $13.77 billion, and GAAP gross margin exploded to 84.6% from 37.7%. CEO Sanjay Mehrotra credited “the strategic value of memory in the AI era” and pointed to multi-year Strategic Customer Agreements locking in HBM4 demand.

Intel’s story is messier. Data Center and AI revenue jumped 59% to $6.262 billion, Client Computing added 13%, and Intel Foundry grew 31%. But Foundry still bled a $2.1 billion operating loss, and a $12.53 billion CHIPS Act escrow charge dragged GAAP EPS to $(2.16).

Business Driver Intel Micron
Growth Engine Xeon 6+, Panther Lake on 18A HBM4, Cloud Memory
Gross Margin 40.4% GAAP 84.6% GAAP
Biggest Wart Foundry losses Cyclical memory pricing

Where the Guidance Really Diverges

Intel guided Q3 revenue to $15.8 billion to $16.8 billion and non-GAAP EPS of only $0.38, softer than the Q2 report. Micron guided Q4 to $50.0 billion in revenue and $31.00 EPS, with roughly 86% gross margins. One company is asking investors to trust a slower ramp. The other is still accelerating.

Price action reflects that gap. Intel is down 18.16% over the past week and 32.75% over one month, though still up 133.88% year to date. Micron is off 15.48% for the week yet holds a 187.67% YTD gain. Options tell the same story: Intel’s full-chain put/call sits at 0.43, meaning hedges have not fully built. Micron sits at 0.87, closer to balanced.

The Next Test Is Margin Credibility

I will be watching whether Intel Foundry can shrink that quarterly loss as 18A-P moves into risk production, and whether Panther Lake actually shows up in 200-plus OEM designs. For Micron, the key is whether the Strategic Customer Agreements smooth pricing when HBM supply catches up in 2027.

Why Intel Looks More Dangerous to Me

For the rest of 2026, I lean toward calling Intel the riskier hold. Its massive year-to-date run-up has run straight into a wall of forward guidance compression, and the Foundry drag is not going away this year. Reddit sentiment already collapsed to very bearish (12) post-earnings. Micron carries real cyclical danger, but the AI memory tightness gives me a business reason to underwrite the next two quarters. If Intel’s Q3 gross margin misses the 42% target, my view gets more cautious, not less.

Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.

Photo of Alex Sirois
About the Author Alex Sirois →

Alex Sirois is a financial writer with experience spanning both retail and institutional investing. He has written for InvestorPlace and held roles at BNY Mellon and Bernstein, giving him a perspective that bridges Main Street portfolios and Wall Street analysis.

Alex holds an MBA from George Washington University and has built his career across multiple industries, including e-commerce, education, and translation — a breadth of experience that informs how he breaks down complex financial topics for everyday investors. His writing is conversational, actionable, and grounded in long-term, buy-and-hold investing principles.

At 247 Wall St., Alex focuses on delivering analysis that is both accessible and useful, with a clear emphasis on helping readers make more informed decisions with their money.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

WDAY Vol: 16,323,850
GDDY Vol: 3,030,517
CSGP Vol: 7,967,696
TTD Vol: 34,667,603
WDC Vol: 8,699,102

Top Losing Stocks

TPR Vol: 8,534,041
CTRA Vol: 73,319,495
CSCO Vol: 61,560,420
GLW Vol: 8,579,035
MPWR Vol: 506,489