His Cotton Farm Lost $200,000. Social Security Wouldn’t Let the Loss Offset This Year’s Comeback.

A cotton farmer claws back from a brutal loss year, only to discover that Social Security calculates his comeback by a completely different rulebook than the IRS does, and the gap between those two numbers can be stunning.

Published September 4, 2026, 2:02pm ET · 3 min read

This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.

Closeup of cotton ready to harvest in large fields in the southern United States, ripe bolls in focus foreground, set against rows receding to distant horizon
© Diana Borden/Shutterstock.com

Bad Crop, Good Crop

A cotton grower watches a storm tear through one season and finishes the year roughly $200,000 in the red. The next crop does what the first one could not: yields recover, prices cooperate and the farm returns to profit. He has already claimed Social Security before full retirement age (FRA), which is 67 for someone born in 1960 or later.

On his federal income-tax return, a qualifying net operating loss (NOL) carried forward from the bad year may reduce taxable income in the rebound year, subject to the tax code’s NOL limits. Social Security does not let that old loss perform the same job when it measures his current self-employment earnings. One farm can therefore have a much softer income-tax year than Social Security earnings year.

Social Security Makes the New Year Stand Alone

A farmer generally reports current farming income and expenses on Schedule F and uses Schedule SE to calculate net earnings from self-employment. Social Security relies on those self-employment earnings both for the worker’s record and, before FRA, the retirement earnings test. The important exception involves the old NOL. Federal Social Security regulations specifically say that a deduction for a net operating loss sustained in another taxable year is disregarded when net earnings from self-employment are calculated.

Suppose this year’s cotton crop produces a healthy current-year farm profit. A prior loss may still help lower his federal taxable income, but it does not erase that current profit when Social Security measures self-employment earnings. For someone who assumed the $200,000 disaster year had built a cushion for the recovery, that distinction can be expensive.

The Earnings Test Sees the Rebound

In 2026, someone under FRA for the entire year can have $24,480 in earnings before Social Security begins withholding $1 in benefits for every $2 above the limit. The test counts wages and net earnings from self-employment. That means the farmer should not use taxable income after an NOL carryforward to estimate whether his benefits will be withheld. The number Social Security cares about can be considerably higher.

The result is not entirely punitive, however. Benefits withheld under the earnings test are not simply erased. When he reaches FRA, Social Security recalculates his retirement benefit to account for months in which benefits were withheld, which can increase the monthly payment going forward.

The Comeback Year Can Help Him Too

The same current-year earnings that can create withholding may also strengthen his retirement benefit. Social Security bases retirement benefits on a worker’s highest 35 years of indexed covered earnings. A profitable farming year can potentially replace a lower year already in that calculation, subject to Social Security’s annual taxable earnings maximum. Schedule SE is also how self-employed workers report earnings used by Social Security.

For a farmer whose earnings history contains weak years from drought, illness or earlier crop failures, another profitable season may therefore have lasting value. The old loss cannot reduce this year’s Social Security earnings, but neither can it prevent those new earnings from improving the record. That makes the rebound more than a tax problem to manage.

Put Both Calculations on the Same Page

Before year-end, the useful exercise is to calculate the income-tax result and the Social Security result separately rather than assuming one bottom line controls both.

  1. Ask the tax preparer how much of the prior NOL can actually be used on this year’s income-tax return and what current-year Schedule F profit will flow toward Schedule SE.
  2. Compare expected net self-employment earnings with the 2026 retirement earnings limit if benefits began before FRA. Current deductible farm expenses can affect that calculation even though an old NOL cannot.
  3. Check the Social Security earnings record for low years. If the rebound can replace one, part of today’s higher earnings may come back as a stronger monthly benefit later.

Last year’s cotton loss can still have real value on the tax return. Social Security simply keeps a different set of books. For a farmer coming back from a disastrous season, that means the good year can cost more now while also doing something useful for retirement later.

Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.

Gerelyn Terzo

Gerelyn Terzo is the author of dividend investing handbook "Dividend Investing Strategies: How to Have Your Cake & Eat It Too." A veteran financial journalist, she covers agri-finance for outlets like Global AgInvesting and the broader stock market and personal finance for 24/7 Wall Street. She began at CNBC and later helped launch Fox Business in New York. Gerelyn currently resides in Woodland Park, Colorado and dabbles in nature photography as a hobby.

All articles →