Special Report
Cities Americans Are Abandoning
July 30, 2020 10:37 am
Last Updated: August 27, 2020 11:39 am
15. Rockford, IL
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2019: -6.3% (-21,938)
> Overall population change, 2010-2019: -3.8% (-13,315)
> Change in employed population, 2010-2019: 3.0% (+4,607)
> 2019 population estimate: 336,116 (152nd out of 383 metro areas)
Rockford, Illinois consistently had one of the highest annual unemployment rates each year between 2010 and 2019. In 2010, its 14.0% unemployment rate was the 14th highest among metro areas, and was well above the nation’s 9.6% rate. Even as Rockford’s unemployment rate improved to 5.7% in 2019, that was still two percentage points higher than the U.S. rate and still ranked among the 20 highest.
The lack of economic opportunities has likely driven many people to move away from the Rust Belt city. Rockford’s population decline from migration of 21,938 accounts for 6.3% of the 2010 population. Like many other Midwestern cities that were struggling economically ahead of COVID-19, the situation has gotten much worse — Rockford’s unemployment rate stood at 20.6% as of May 2020.
14. Sierra Vista-Douglas, AZ
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2019: -6.3% (-8,272)
> Overall population change, 2010-2019: -4.1% (-5,437)
> Change in employed population, 2010-2019: -7.7% (-3,999)
> 2019 population estimate: 125,922 (315th out of 383 metro areas)
The Sierra Vista-Douglas metro area is the only part of Arizona that residents have been consistently moving away from over the past decade. After in- and out-bound migration over the years from 2010 to 2019, the southern Arizona metro area had 8,272 fewer residents– a decline likely driven by the difficult job market There were nearly 4,000 fewer people working in the metro area in 2019 than there were in 2010. In 2019, Sierra Vista-Douglas had an annual unemployment rate of 5.7% — two full percentage points higher than the U.S. overall.
Since the Great Recession, the economy of the Sierra Vista-Douglas area has not matched the improvement seen in the rest of the country. In 2010, its annual unemployment rate of 9.3% was actually slightly better than that of the nation overall. But the U.S. annual unemployment rate improved to 3.7% by 2019, while Sierra Vista-Douglas had an unemployment rate two percentage points higher.
13. El Centro, CA
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2019: -6.8% (-11,851)
> Overall population change, 2010-2019: 3.8% (+6,691)
> Change in employed population, 2010-2019: +4.2% (+2,353)
> 2019 population estimate: 181,215 (233rd out of 383 metro areas)
El Centro, California is about 100 miles east of San Diego, just north of the U.S. border with Mexico. The metro area had the highest annual unemployment rate in America every year from 2010 to 2019, except in 2013 when it ranked second highest. In 2019, its annual unemployment rate was 18.3%, nearly five times the U.S. rate of 3.7%.
This poor job market is likely a factor in El Centro’s negative net migration. Nearly 12,000 more people moved away from El Centro than moved to it in the past decade. While job opportunities appear to be limited, the city does not have a highly qualified labor pool for many jobs, as only 14.1% of El Centro residents have a bachelor’s degree or above, the lowest share of any metro area.
12. Decatur, IL
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2019: -7.1% (-7,840)
> Overall population change, 2010-2019: -6.1% (-6,768)
> Change in employed population, 2010-2019: -6.2% (-3,086)
> 2019 population estimate: 104,009 (347th out of 383 metro areas)
Decatur is one of four Illinois metro areas to have among the largest population declines due to migration. It is also one of just a dozen metro areas to lose over 7% of its 2010 population to migration, with a net population decline of 7,840.
The central Illinois city is one of a number of Rust Belt cities that has lost manufacturing jobs over the past decade, and struggled economically as a result. Decatur has a poverty rate of 18.0%, well above the national rate of 13.3%.
11. Vineland-Bridgeton, NJ
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2019: -7.5% (-11,725)
> Overall population change, 2010-2019: -4.5% (-7,100)
> Change in employed population, 2010-2019: -2.8% (-1,752)
> 2019 population estimate: 149,527 (281st out of 383 metro areas)
The Vineland-Bridgeton area, located on the southern coast of New Jersey, has experienced among the largest population declines due to migration over the past decade. From 2010 to 2019, 11,725 more people left the area than moved to it — many likely in search of job opportunities.
Those who hold college degrees are more likely to find jobs that pay well, but just 16.6% of adults 25 years old and older in the Vineland-Bridgeton area have at least a bachelor’s degree, compared to 32.6% of Americans from the same age group.
Sponsored: Tips for Investing
A financial advisor can help you understand the advantages and disadvantages of investment properties. Finding a qualified financial advisor doesn’t have to be hard. SmartAsset’s free tool matches you with up to three financial advisors who serve your area, and you can interview your advisor matches at no cost to decide which one is right for you. If you’re ready to find an advisor who can help you achieve your financial goals, get started now.
Investing in real estate can diversify your portfolio. But expanding your horizons may add additional costs. If you’re an investor looking to minimize expenses, consider checking out online brokerages. They often offer low investment fees, helping you maximize your profit.