Special Report
How the Doctor Shortage Crisis in South Carolina Compares to Other States
Published:
Last Updated:
The United States has been battling a doctor shortage for a few years. The COVID-19 pandemic exposed just how big the problem is. Medical institutions have been warning that there could be a shortage of up to 124,000 primary care physicians and specialty care doctors nationwide within a decade, according to research by the Association of American Medical Colleges.
There is already a shortage in some places in the U.S., with rural areas disproportionately affected. If people living in rural communities, minorities, and those with no health insurance, had the same access to medical care as others have, the country would need an additional 180,400 doctors to meet demand. (These are the states where the most people don’t have health insurance.)
According to the 2021 State Physician Workforce Data Report from the Association of American Medical Colleges, there are 940,254 physicians actively practicing in the United States. Adjusting for population using data from the U.S. Census Bureau’s 2021 American Community Survey, this comes out to 283.3 for every 100,000 people. And this number varies considerably by state.
In South Carolina, there are 12,197 active physicians, or 235.0 for every 100,000 people, the 15th fewest among states.
Other than a low supply of doctors, lack of health insurance can be another barrier to accessing care. An estimated 10.0% of South Carolina residents are uninsured, the 11th most among states. Meanwhile, 17.8% of adults across the state report being in less than optimal health, compared to 17.1% of adults nationwide.
Data on the percentage of adults reporting fair or poor health is from the 2022 County Health Rankings & Roadmaps program of the University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute. Data on the share of the population without health insurance came from the 2021 ACS and are one-year estimates.
Rank | State | Doctors per 100,000 people | Total mumber of active physicians | Adults in fair or poor health (%) | Uninsured rate (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Idaho | 184.3 | 3,504 | 15.1 | 8.8 |
2 | Mississippi | 198.5 | 5,857 | 22.0 | 11.9 |
3 | Oklahoma | 208.0 | 8,293 | 21.3 | 13.8 |
4 | Wyoming | 211.6 | 1,225 | 15.7 | 12.2 |
5 | Nevada | 214.1 | 6,731 | 20.1 | 11.6 |
6 | Arkansas | 214.8 | 6,500 | 24.1 | 9.2 |
7 | Utah | 215.6 | 7,198 | 14.8 | 9.0 |
8 | Alabama | 217.9 | 10,983 | 21.4 | 9.9 |
9 | Iowa | 221.0 | 7,056 | 13.6 | 4.8 |
10 | Texas | 227.5 | 67,182 | 20.9 | 18.0 |
11 | Georgia | 232.2 | 25,072 | 19.3 | 12.6 |
12 | Kentucky | 233.5 | 10,528 | 22.0 | 5.7 |
13 | Indiana | 233.9 | 15,918 | 18.9 | 7.5 |
14 | Kansas | 234.2 | 6,874 | 17.1 | 9.2 |
15 | South Carolina | 235.0 | 12,197 | 17.8 | 10.0 |
16 | North Dakota | 235.6 | 1,826 | 13.3 | 7.9 |
17 | Nebraska | 245.5 | 4,820 | 13.9 | 7.1 |
18 | South Dakota | 247.3 | 2,214 | 15.1 | 9.5 |
19 | New Mexico | 249.0 | 5,269 | 20.0 | 10.0 |
20 | Montana | 249.0 | 2,750 | 14.4 | 8.2 |
21 | Arizona | 252.1 | 18,343 | 18.3 | 10.7 |
22 | Tennessee | 253.6 | 17,687 | 20.3 | 10.0 |
23 | North Carolina | 262.1 | 27,650 | 18.5 | 10.4 |
24 | Virginia | 264.7 | 22,874 | 16.1 | 6.8 |
25 | Florida | 270.1 | 58,822 | 17.8 | 12.1 |
26 | Wisconsin | 271.0 | 15,975 | 15.0 | 5.4 |
27 | Louisiana | 271.6 | 12,557 | 21.7 | 7.6 |
28 | West Virginia | 275.6 | 4,914 | 24.3 | 6.1 |
29 | Washington | 280.8 | 21,731 | 15.7 | 6.4 |
30 | Delaware | 284.0 | 2,850 | 18.0 | 5.7 |
31 | Alaska | 286.8 | 2,101 | 15.7 | 11.4 |
32 | California | 289.8 | 113,718 | 17.8 | 7.0 |
33 | Colorado | 291.7 | 16,956 | 13.7 | 8.0 |
34 | Illinois | 293.0 | 37,122 | 17.1 | 7.0 |
35 | Missouri | 296.6 | 18,297 | 17.6 | 9.4 |
36 | Michigan | 298.9 | 30,040 | 18.2 | 5.0 |
37 | Ohio | 299.9 | 35,333 | 18.1 | 6.5 |
38 | New Jersey | 300.3 | 27,832 | 15.5 | 7.2 |
39 | Minnesota | 308.7 | 17,617 | 13.3 | 4.5 |
40 | Oregon | 309.2 | 13,127 | 17.4 | 6.1 |
41 | Hawaii | 316.1 | 4,557 | 15.3 | 3.9 |
42 | New Hampshire | 316.1 | 4,391 | 14.3 | 5.1 |
43 | Pennsylvania | 324.4 | 42,051 | 17.6 | 5.5 |
44 | Maine | 324.9 | 4,459 | 17.2 | 5.7 |
45 | Connecticut | 359.9 | 12,977 | 14.3 | 5.2 |
46 | Rhode Island | 370.8 | 4,063 | 16.3 | 4.3 |
47 | Vermont | 373.3 | 2,410 | 12.6 | 3.7 |
48 | New York | 381.9 | 75,749 | 16.4 | 5.2 |
49 | Maryland | 385.9 | 23,791 | 14.0 | 6.1 |
50 | Massachusetts | 459.8 | 32,116 | 13.4 | 2.5 |
If you want your portfolio to pay you cash like clockwork, it’s time to stop blindly following conventional wisdom like relying on Dividend Aristocrats. There’s a better option, and we want to show you. We’re offering a brand-new report on 2 stocks we believe offer the rare combination of a high dividend yield and significant stock appreciation upside. If you’re tired of feeling one step behind in this market, this free report is a must-read for you.
Click here to download your FREE copy of “2 Dividend Legends to Hold Forever” and start improving your portfolio today.
Thank you for reading! Have some feedback for us?
Contact the 24/7 Wall St. editorial team.