The COVID-19 pandemic was a public health crisis that sent shockwaves through the U.S. economy — and the country’s social fabric. In addition to claiming over half a million American lives, the pandemic sent unemployment soaring and exacerbated existing problems, as drug overdoses and crime rates spiked in some parts of the country.
Even before the pandemic, however, there were cities and towns already grappling with severe social and economic distress. These communities have long struggled with challenges such as high unemployment, poverty, crime, drug misuse, and limited access to essential services.
Based on a weighted index of two-dozen social and economic measures, 24/7 Wall St. identified the worst place to live in every state. We considered cities, towns, villages, and census designated places home to at least 8,000 people.
Of the nine cities in North Dakota with sufficient data, Jamestown, located in the eastern half of the state, ranks as the worst place to live. Over the last five years, the number employed Jamestown residents fell by 4.4%. Meanwhile, every other city in the state added jobs over the same period. Perhaps due in part to reduced job opportunities, the local poverty rate of 14.7% is higher than the 10.7% state poverty rate, and labor force participants in Jamestown are more likely to be out of work than their workers across the state as a whole.
Home values can be indicative of an area’s desirability as a place to live, and in Jamestown, the typical home is worth $144,800, the lowest of any city in the state and well below the $193,900 median home value across the state as a whole.
Our index is composed of data across four categories: affordability, economy, quality of life, and community. Data is all for the most recent year available and came from the U.S. Census Bureau, the FBI, The Department of Agriculture, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and other sources. This is the worst city to live in every state.
Place | Median home value ($) | Unemployment rate (%) | Poverty rate (%) |
---|---|---|---|
Alabama: Atmore | 94,300 | 15.7 | 34.6 |
Alaska: Fairbanks | 211,500 | 7.7 | 11.0 |
Arizona: Douglas | 100,300 | 11.4 | 30.1 |
Arkansas: Helena-West Helena | 73,400 | 11.8 | 45.2 |
California: California City | 124,500 | 19.1 | 24.1 |
Colorado: Pueblo | 141,000 | 8.4 | 23.5 |
Connecticut: Hartford | 165,300 | 12.0 | 28.1 |
Delaware: Wilmington | 168,000 | 8.4 | 26.0 |
Florida: Florida City | 153,100 | 14.0 | 40.0 |
Georgia: Albany | 99,800 | 13.7 | 30.8 |
Hawaii: Makaha | 404,900 | 12.7 | 31.0 |
Idaho: Mountain Home | 144,200 | 6.6 | 16.4 |
Illinois: Sauk Village | 70,400 | 16.3 | 31.8 |
Indiana: Gary | 66,100 | 12.4 | 30.6 |
Iowa: Fort Madison | 81,600 | 8.9 | 15.9 |
Kansas: Coffeyville | 55,800 | 6.0 | 29.3 |
Kentucky: Mayfield | 100,200 | 11.6 | 34.7 |
Louisiana: Opelousas | 98,100 | 8.8 | 43.3 |
Maine: Sanford | 183,800 | 6.4 | 13.9 |
Maryland: Baltimore | 160,100 | 8.3 | 21.2 |
Massachusetts: Holyoke | 195,800 | 6.0 | 29.3 |
Michigan: Highland Park | 45,700 | 22.6 | 46.5 |
Minnesota: Virginia | 92,200 | 6.4 | 25.5 |
Mississippi: Yazoo City | 70,900 | 20.5 | 44.8 |
Missouri: St. Louis | 138,700 | 7.0 | 21.8 |
Montana: Havre | 149,300 | 6.6 | 17.8 |
Nebraska: Scottsbluff | 116,600 | 6.4 | 18.0 |
Nevada: Fernley | 221,200 | 5.8 | 9.9 |
New Hampshire: Berlin | 92,100 | 8.0 | 18.5 |
New Jersey: Bridgeton | 109,200 | 6.9 | 31.2 |
New Mexico: Gallup | 132,000 | 7.4 | 28.4 |
New York: Binghamton | 91,000 | 10.4 | 32.6 |
North Carolina: Reidsville | 103,500 | 9.5 | 24.3 |
North Dakota: Jamestown | 144,800 | 3.2 | 14.7 |
Ohio: East Cleveland | 58,100 | 18.8 | 37.5 |
Oklahoma: McAlester | 101,600 | 6.9 | 19.5 |
Oregon: Klamath Falls | 159,500 | 9.3 | 22.7 |
Pennsylvania: McKeesport | 48,000 | 12.1 | 31.4 |
Rhode Island: Central Falls | 159,100 | 6.8 | 30.2 |
South Carolina: Lancaster | 141,600 | 18.0 | 35.3 |
South Dakota: Huron | 91,900 | 1.6 | 19.7 |
Tennessee: Memphis | 101,800 | 8.7 | 25.1 |
Texas: Robstown | 64,000 | 15.4 | 38.4 |
Utah: Price | 144,700 | 7.7 | 21.9 |
Vermont: Barre | 158,300 | 7.4 | 22.8 |
Virginia: Petersburg | 108,100 | 11.7 | 24.1 |
Washington: Tukwila | 315,000 | 7.6 | 17.2 |
West Virginia: Huntington | 98,200 | 6.8 | 32.3 |
Wisconsin: Beloit | 89,900 | 8.8 | 23.1 |
Wyoming: Rawlins | 171,700 | 5.3 | 11.0 |
Essential Tips for Investing: Sponsored
A financial advisor can help you understand the advantages and disadvantages of investment properties. Finding a qualified financial advisor doesn’t have to be hard. SmartAsset’s free tool matches you with up to three financial advisors who serve your area, and you can interview your advisor matches at no cost to decide which one is right for you. If you’re ready to find an advisor who can help you achieve your financial goals, get started now.
Investing in real estate can diversify your portfolio. But expanding your horizons may add additional costs. If you’re an investor looking to minimize expenses, consider checking out online brokerages. They often offer low investment fees, helping you maximize your profit.
Thank you for reading! Have some feedback for us?
Contact the 24/7 Wall St. editorial team.