Harvard Business Review: ‘M&A is a mug’s game’

Photo of Steven M. Peters
By Steven M. Peters Updated Published

Remember, when anybody suggests that Apple buy anything, that 70% to 90% of acquisitions are abysmal failures.

 

An oldie but goodie, from Roger L. Martin’s M&A: The One Thing You Need to Get Right, in HBA’s June 2016 issue:

To be sure, we’ve seen successes. The purchase of NeXT in 1997 for what now looks like a trivial $404 million saved Apple and set the stage for the greatest accumulation of shareholder value in corporate history. The purchase of Android for $50 million in 2005 gave Google the biggest presence in smartphone operating systems, one of the world’s most important product markets. And Warren Buffett’s rolling acquisition of GEICO from 1951 to 1996 created Berkshire Hathaway’s cornerstone asset. But these are the exceptions that prove the rule confirmed by nearly all studies: M&A is a mug’s game, in which typically 70%–90% of acquisitions are abysmal failures.

My take: I can attest to that. I watched AOL Time Warner from the inside and took the hit in my 401K. Apple investors are lucky that Tim Cook is no Gerry Levin.

Thanks to friend-of-the-blog Fred Stein for the pointer.

See also:

[apple-subscribe]

Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.

Photo of Steven M. Peters
About the Author Steven M. Peters →

Our $500K AI Portfolio

See us invest in our favorite AI stock ideas for free

Our Investment Portfolio

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

FDS Vol: 929,614
IT Vol: 1,375,344
INTU Vol: 6,564,709
VLO Vol: 2,870,552
PAYC Vol: 620,867

Top Losing Stocks

CTRA Vol: 73,319,495
ORCL Vol: 56,688,573
INTC Vol: 100,754,655
LRCX Vol: 9,770,514
ON Vol: 9,568,853