Most investors know the market goes up over time. Indeed, over the very long-term, bears are likely to get crushed. And while short-selling (or betting against the market via other means) can generate some big gains in short amounts of time (for those who time big downside moves right), it’s also true that most investor portfolios that outperform are those that simply buy and hold. Recent studies have shown that the best-performing funds are often those owned by folks who are dead or forgot their login information for years.
The market is a compounding machine, which means betting against the market directly or via ETFs such as the ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (Nasdaq: SQQQ) can be very expensive over long periods of time.
Let’s dive into how much an investor would have lost by investing $10,000 into this ETF 10 years ago. This data has been pulled from YahooFinance and some simple math is used to calculate the return of this ETF over time.
Why It Matters
Source: zimmytws / Shutterstock.com
As a triple-leveraged ETF, SQQQ appreciates three-times the Nasdaq’s decline on down days, and loses three-times the return of the Nasdaq on up days. We think it’s important for investors to understand how leveraged ETFs work, and why betting against the market over long periods of time is a bad idea.
Compounding Can Work Against You
Source: Thinkstock
The whole idea behind the stock market is that it’s a compounding mechanism. Betting on a broader index, such as the tech-heavy Nasdaq, is great for long-term growth investors. You gain exposure to the highest-growth and largest tech companies in the world, which are replaced from time to time based on performance and the rise of new high-performing juggernauts.
Betting against the Nasdaq via a vehicle like the SQQQ ETF can pay off over short periods of time. Looking at this ETF’s chart from April 1, 2010 to June 1, 2010 we can see that the ETF surged more than 37%. That’s a great return for a single quarter. But that was right near the end of the Great Recession, right about when stocks started to bounce back. Those who held since then are down 99.9975%. Yup, you read that right.
Now, the 10-year return for those who stayed invested in the SQQQ isn’t as bad. It’s only 99.94%. But you get my drift – eventually, this fund trends toward zero, as the stock market continues to make new highs over the very long-term.
Smart Investors Are Quietly Loading Up on These “Dividend Legends”
If you want your portfolio to pay you cash like clockwork, it’s time to stop blindly following conventional wisdom like relying on Dividend Aristocrats. There’s a better option, and we want to show you. We’re offering a brand-new report on 2 stocks we believe offer the rare combination of a high dividend yield and significant stock appreciation upside. If you’re tired of feeling one step behind in this market, this free report is a must-read for you.
Click here to download your FREE copy of “2 Dividend Legends to Hold Forever” and start improving your portfolio today.
Thank you for reading! Have some feedback for us?
Contact the 24/7 Wall St. editorial team.
Editors' Picks
