SEC Settles Misrepresentation Charges with Credit Rating Agency
The SEC charged credit rating agency DBRS with misrepresenting its surveillance methodology for ratings of certain complex financial instruments during a three-year period.
This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) charged credit rating agency DBRS with misrepresenting its surveillance methodology for ratings of certain complex financial instruments during a three-year period. The firm settled and agreed to pay roughly $6 million for the charges.
The SEC investigation that followed an annual examination of DBRS by the agency’s Office of Credit Ratings found that the firm misrepresented that it would monitor on a monthly basis each of its outstanding ratings of U.S. residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) and re-securitized real estate mortgage investment conduits (Re-REMICs) by conducting a three-step quantitative analysis and subjecting each rating to review by a surveillance committee.
It found that DBRS did not conduct the analysis on a monthly basis, nor did it present each rating to the surveillance committee each month, and when the committee convened it reviewed only a limited subset of the outstanding RMBS and Re-REMIC ratings. The firm did not have adequate staffing and technological resources to conduct surveillance for each of its outstanding RMBS and Re-REMIC ratings monthly as stated in its surveillance methodology.
Without admitting or denying the SEC’s findings, DBRS agreed to disgorgement of $2.742 million in rating surveillance fees it collected between the years 2009 to 2011. Additionally, the firm will pay prejudgment interest of $147,482 and a penalty of $2.925 million. DBRS also agreed to be censured and retain an independent consultant to assess and improve its internal controls among other things.
Andrew J. Ceresney, director of the SEC’s Division of Enforcement, said:
Rating agencies play a critical role in the capital markets and have an obligation to investors to comply with their published rating and surveillance methodologies. Lack of resources is no excuse for failing to conduct surveillance promised in various SEC filings and other public documents.
ALSO READ: The 10 Most Profitable Companies in the World
Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.
Chris Lange is a financial and geopolitical writer with more than a decade of experience covering a myriad of topics. He has published thousands of articles for 24/7 Wall St., with past coverage focused heavily on stocks, IPOs, healthcare, defense, global affairs, and technology.
His work has been quoted, or referenced by a number of outlets including Business Insider, USA Today, Yahoo Finance, MSN, The Motley Fool, and many other publications. A graduate of Southwestern University, he studied business with a focus on investments and has previous experience in banking and startups.
When not reading or writing the news, he is following his passion for Lacrosse, playing chess, or building solar projects with his dad.
