Special Report
How Wyoming's Population Will Change in the Next 20 Years
Published:
Last Updated:
Each year, millions of Americans pack up and move to a new state – either for a job, family reasons, a change of climate, or any number of other reasons. Migration and natural population change resulting from births and deaths can cause significant demographic shifts, which have consequences for local economies and governments.
Negative or slow population growth can lead to weaker economic growth and fewer economic opportunities – which in turn can push more people out of a given state. Population decline can also mean reduced revenue for state governments and limited funding for public works and services and reduced ability to meet budgetary obligations. Here is a look at the states collecting the most in income tax.
According to a study conducted by the Weldon Cooper Center for Public Service at the University of Virginia, Wyoming’s population is projected to expand by 5.2% between 2020 and 2040 – an increase of 30,407 people. If the Cooper Center’s projections bear out, Wyoming will go from being the least populous state to being the second least populous, also taking into account population changes in other states.
The projected change is in keeping with the trend of the last decade. Between 2010 and 2020, the number of people living in Wyoming climbed by 3.9%, or 21,754 people.
A full methodological explanation for how these projections were calculated can be found here.
Rank | Name | Projected 2020 to 2040 pop. change (%) | 2020 population | 2020 rank | 2040 projected population | 2040 rank |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Texas | 35.2 | 29,604,099 | 2 | 40,015,913 | 2 |
2 | North Dakota | 34.3 | 789,403 | 47 | 1,060,457 | 45 |
3 | Utah | 34.1 | 3,240,569 | 30 | 4,344,339 | 29 |
4 | Florida | 32.0 | 21,877,257 | 3 | 28,886,983 | 3 |
5 | Colorado | 31.7 | 5,843,359 | 20 | 7,692,907 | 17 |
6 | Nevada | 30.1 | 3,119,265 | 32 | 4,058,371 | 30 |
7 | Washington | 27.3 | 7,681,818 | 13 | 9,776,126 | 12 |
8 | Arizona | 26.1 | 7,268,694 | 14 | 9,166,279 | 14 |
9 | Idaho | 25.4 | 1,777,249 | 39 | 2,227,842 | 36 |
10 | South Carolina | 22.5 | 5,184,564 | 23 | 6,352,502 | 22 |
11 | Oregon | 21.0 | 4,267,534 | 27 | 5,164,041 | 24 |
12 | North Carolina | 19.8 | 10,568,033 | 9 | 12,658,927 | 7 |
13 | Georgia | 19.5 | 10,725,351 | 8 | 12,820,271 | 5 |
14 | Delaware | 17.9 | 987,393 | 45 | 1,164,344 | 44 |
15 | South Dakota | 17.0 | 891,688 | 46 | 1,043,032 | 47 |
16 | Montana | 15.0 | 1,074,635 | 43 | 1,236,304 | 43 |
17 | California | 14.9 | 40,438,640 | 1 | 46,467,001 | 1 |
18 | Virginia | 14.1 | 8,655,021 | 12 | 9,876,728 | 11 |
19 | Tennessee | 14.0 | 6,861,856 | 16 | 7,823,662 | 15 |
20 | Minnesota | 12.0 | 5,683,666 | 22 | 6,364,886 | 20 |
21 | Nebraska | 12.0 | 1,956,876 | 37 | 2,190,918 | 37 |
22 | Hawaii | 11.4 | 1,453,902 | 40 | 1,619,703 | 40 |
23 | Maryland | 11.1 | 6,161,345 | 19 | 6,842,902 | 19 |
24 | Oklahoma | 10.9 | 4,001,180 | 28 | 4,439,038 | 28 |
25 | Massachusetts | 10.9 | 6,982,092 | 15 | 7,742,628 | 16 |
26 | Alaska | 9.1 | 751,328 | 48 | 819,954 | 48 |
27 | Louisiana | 6.7 | 4,742,900 | 25 | 5,062,780 | 25 |
28 | Iowa | 6.5 | 3,184,240 | 31 | 3,392,783 | 32 |
29 | Arkansas | 5.9 | 3,038,491 | 33 | 3,217,535 | 33 |
30 | Indiana | 5.3 | 6,737,581 | 17 | 7,095,000 | 18 |
31 | Wyoming | 5.2 | 585,380 | 50 | 615,787 | 49 |
32 | Kentucky | 4.8 | 4,498,533 | 26 | 4,714,761 | 27 |
33 | New York | 4.2 | 20,031,150 | 4 | 20,873,488 | 4 |
34 | New Jersey | 4.2 | 9,088,074 | 11 | 9,470,012 | 13 |
35 | Kansas | 3.3 | 2,936,212 | 35 | 3,032,653 | 34 |
36 | Missouri | 3.2 | 6,161,471 | 18 | 6,359,970 | 21 |
37 | New Hampshire | 3.0 | 1,352,917 | 41 | 1,393,451 | 41 |
38 | Alabama | 3.0 | 4,911,278 | 24 | 5,056,796 | 26 |
39 | Wisconsin | 2.7 | 5,837,176 | 21 | 5,997,137 | 23 |
40 | New Mexico | 1.3 | 2,099,134 | 36 | 2,127,318 | 38 |
41 | Ohio | 0.4 | 11,705,262 | 7 | 11,751,540 | 9 |
42 | Pennsylvania | -0.3 | 12,844,885 | 5 | 12,809,150 | 6 |
43 | Michigan | -0.3 | 9,992,315 | 10 | 9,960,115 | 10 |
44 | Rhode Island | -0.7 | 1,062,334 | 44 | 1,055,318 | 46 |
45 | Maine | -0.9 | 1,338,780 | 42 | 1,326,159 | 42 |
46 | Mississippi | -0.9 | 2,990,498 | 34 | 2,962,160 | 35 |
47 | Connecticut | -1.4 | 3,593,542 | 29 | 3,542,707 | 31 |
48 | Illinois | -3.1 | 12,791,188 | 6 | 12,397,564 | 8 |
49 | Vermont | -3.4 | 622,868 | 49 | 601,865 | 50 |
50 | West Virginia | -7.8 | 1,801,966 | 38 | 1,661,849 | 39 |
If you want your portfolio to pay you cash like clockwork, it’s time to stop blindly following conventional wisdom like relying on Dividend Aristocrats. There’s a better option, and we want to show you. We’re offering a brand-new report on 2 stocks we believe offer the rare combination of a high dividend yield and significant stock appreciation upside. If you’re tired of feeling one step behind in this market, this free report is a must-read for you.
Click here to download your FREE copy of “2 Dividend Legends to Hold Forever” and start improving your portfolio today.
Thank you for reading! Have some feedback for us?
Contact the 24/7 Wall St. editorial team.