Most Americans are woefully underprepared for retirement. Based on analysis of Federal Reserve data by the accounting firm PwC, the typical American between the ages of 55 and 64 has just $120,000 in a retirement savings account. Though the vast majority of retirees supplement their savings with Social Security income, the average monthly Social Security payment is only $1,694 – not nearly enough to cover typical living expenses, let alone luxuries like travel and dining out.
Partially as a result, the number of Americans working past retirement age is rising fast. Data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics shows that more than 26% Americans between ages 65 to 74 were still working in 2020, and that share is projected to hit 32% by 2030. In 1995, about 17.5% of Americans that age were working, and the percentage was even lower before that.
For those who do not want to work past age 65 and still be financially secure, there is a certain amount of money they can expect to need. This amount should account for expenditures throughout retirement and can come from retirement savings or other sources of income.
According to the Consumer Expenditure Survey from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the typical retirement-age American spent $52,141 in 2021. Adjusting this figure for average state-level cost of living, inflation, and average life expectancy at age 65 – plus a 15% financial cushion – Vermont residents can reasonably expect to spend, on average, $1,308,556 over the course of their retirement starting at age 65, the 17th highest amount of all states.
It is important to note that this figure does not reflect a retirement savings target, as investment and interest income, pension plans, and Social Security can each supplement retirement savings.
All data used for the calculations in this story are from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the Bureau of Economic Analysis, and the National Center for Health Statistics. For each year of life beyond age 65, we added 2% of annual expenditures to account for inflation, based on the Federal Reserve’s target inflation rate. Click here to read our full methodology.
| Rank | Geo | Est. cost of a comfortable retirement at age 65 ($) | Cost of living | Pop. who are 65 and older (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hawaii | 1,501,762 | 13.2% higher than avg. | 19.6 |
| 2 | California | 1,482,796 | 11.8% higher than avg. | 15.2 |
| 3 | New York | 1,452,383 | 9.5% higher than avg. | 17.5 |
| 4 | New Jersey | 1,447,011 | 9.1% higher than avg. | 16.9 |
| 5 | Washington | 1,444,173 | 8.9% higher than avg. | 16.2 |
| 6 | Massachusetts | 1,413,270 | 6.6% higher than avg. | 17.4 |
| 7 | Maryland | 1,408,866 | 6.2% higher than avg. | 16.3 |
| 8 | Alaska | 1,385,205 | 4.4% higher than avg. | 13.4 |
| 9 | Oregon | 1,366,543 | 3% higher than avg. | 18.6 |
| 10 | Colorado | 1,366,238 | 3% higher than avg. | 15.1 |
| 11 | Connecticut | 1,360,853 | 2.6% higher than avg. | 18.0 |
| 12 | New Hampshire | 1,359,620 | 2.5% higher than avg. | 19.3 |
| 13 | Virginia | 1,356,543 | 2.3% higher than avg. | 16.3 |
| 14 | Rhode Island | 1,353,956 | 2.1% higher than avg. | 18.3 |
| 15 | Florida | 1,345,295 | 1.4% higher than avg. | 21.1 |
| 16 | Illinois | 1,345,057 | 1.4% higher than avg. | 16.6 |
| 17 | Vermont | 1,308,556 | 1.3% lower than avg. | 20.6 |
| 18 | Texas | 1,306,460 | 1.5% lower than avg. | 13.2 |
| 19 | Minnesota | 1,305,413 | 1.6% lower than avg. | 16.8 |
| 20 | Delaware | 1,295,518 | 2.3% lower than avg. | 20.1 |
| 21 | Maine | 1,289,258 | 2.8% lower than avg. | 21.7 |
| 22 | Arizona | 1,282,839 | 3.3% lower than avg. | 18.3 |
| 23 | Pennsylvania | 1,278,196 | 3.6% lower than avg. | 19.0 |
| 24 | Georgia | 1,270,411 | 4.2% lower than avg. | 14.7 |
| 25 | Nevada | 1,267,214 | 4.5% lower than avg. | 16.5 |
| 26 | Utah | 1,254,601 | 5.4% lower than avg. | 11.6 |
| 27 | Michigan | 1,250,105 | 5.7% lower than avg. | 18.1 |
| 28 | North Carolina | 1,244,163 | 6.2% lower than avg. | 17.0 |
| 29 | South Carolina | 1,242,677 | 6.3% lower than avg. | 18.6 |
| 30 | Wisconsin | 1,238,088 | 6.7% lower than avg. | 17.9 |
| 31 | Indiana | 1,229,971 | 7.3% lower than avg. | 16.4 |
| 32 | Ohio | 1,226,310 | 7.5% lower than avg. | 17.8 |
| 33 | Missouri | 1,220,514 | 8% lower than avg. | 17.6 |
| 34 | Idaho | 1,217,252 | 8.2% lower than avg. | 16.5 |
| 35 | Nebraska | 1,216,920 | 8.2% lower than avg. | 16.4 |
| 36 | Montana | 1,214,480 | 8.4% lower than avg. | 19.7 |
| 37 | Wyoming | 1,212,503 | 8.6% lower than avg. | 17.9 |
| 38 | Louisiana | 1,210,620 | 8.7% lower than avg. | 16.6 |
| 39 | Kansas | 1,209,042 | 8.8% lower than avg. | 16.7 |
| 40 | North Dakota | 1,208,325 | 8.9% lower than avg. | 16.0 |
| 41 | Tennessee | 1,205,023 | 9.1% lower than avg. | 17.0 |
| 42 | West Virginia | 1,203,816 | 9.2% lower than avg. | 20.7 |
| 43 | Oklahoma | 1,197,264 | 9.7% lower than avg. | 16.2 |
| 44 | South Dakota | 1,195,646 | 9.9% lower than avg. | 17.6 |
| 45 | New Mexico | 1,192,462 | 10.1% lower than avg. | 18.5 |
| 46 | Iowa | 1,187,966 | 10.4% lower than avg. | 17.8 |
| 47 | Arkansas | 1,186,335 | 10.6% lower than avg. | 17.4 |
| 48 | Kentucky | 1,182,077 | 10.9% lower than avg. | 17.0 |
| 49 | Alabama | 1,169,013 | 11.9% lower than avg. | 17.6 |
| 50 | Mississippi | 1,148,614 | 13.4% lower than avg. | 16.8 |
Smart Investors Are Quietly Loading Up on These “Dividend Legends” (Sponsored)
If you want your portfolio to pay you cash like clockwork, it’s time to stop blindly following conventional wisdom like relying on Dividend Aristocrats. There’s a better option, and we want to show you. We’re offering a brand-new report on 2 stocks we believe offer the rare combination of a high dividend yield and significant stock appreciation upside. If you’re tired of feeling one step behind in this market, this free report is a must-read for you.
Click here to download your FREE copy of “2 Dividend Legends to Hold Forever” and start improving your portfolio today.
Thank you for reading! Have some feedback for us?
Contact the 24/7 Wall St. editorial team.
Editors' Picks
