The Poorest County in Every State

Print Email

Source: Brent Moore / Flickr

1. Alabama: Sumter County
> County median household income: $21,663
> State median household income: $46,472
> Poverty rate: 36.0%
> Unemployment rate: 5.3%

Sumter County, located in western Alabama along the Mississippi state border, is the poorest county in Alabama and one of the poorest in the United States. A majority of households in Sumter earn less than $22,000 a year. Even more staggering, 28.2% of households earn less than $10,000 a year, the second largest share of any of the more than 3,142 counties and county equivalents in the United States.

Like many other counties on this list, Sumter is shrinking rapidly. In the last five years, the county’s population shrunk by 4.3%, even as Alabama’s population as a whole grew by 1.5%. Now home to 13,000 people, the county’s population has fallen steadily since it peaked at nearly 33,000 in 1900.

Source: Public Domain / Wikimedia Commons

2. Alaska: Kusilvak Census Area
> County median household income: $36,468
> State median household income: $76,114
> Poverty rate: 39.1%
> Unemployment rate: N/A

The typical household in the Kusilvak Census Area in Alaska earns just $36,468 a year, less than half the median income of $76,114 across the state as a whole. The area lies along the coast of the Bering Sea and is bisected by the Yukon River. The low income likely contribute to the widespread financial hardship in the area. Slightly more than 39% of Kusilvak residents live below the poverty line, nearly four times the 10.2% poverty rate in Alaska.

Well-educated populations typically report higher incomes. In the Kusilvak Census Area, fewer than 5% of adults have a bachelor’s degree or higher, roughly a sixth of the 29.0% share of adults in Alaska with at least four-year college degree.

Source: Oralleff / Getty Images

3. Arizona: Apache County
> County median household income: $32,360
> State median household income: $53,510
> Poverty rate: 35.9%
> Unemployment rate: 9.4%

Over half of all households in Apache County, Arizona, earn less than $32,000 a year, and about one in every five households earn less than $10,000 a year.

Native Americans living on reservations typically face far greater economic hurdles than other populations. Apache County, which covers much of eastern Arizona along the New Mexico border, is made up largely of the Navajo Nation Reservation. About 73% of the Apache County population identify as Native American.

Source: BOB WESTON / Getty Images

4. Arkansas: Phillips County
> County median household income: $26,652
> State median household income: $43,813
> Poverty rate: 33.0%
> Unemployment rate: 5.1%

Phillips County is located in eastern Arkansas along the Mississippi River. The poorest county in the state and one of the poorest in the country, Phillips’ median household income of $26,652 a year is well below both the state median annual household income of $43,813 and the national median of $57,652.

Employment opportunities are relatively scarce in Phillips County as unemployment stood at 5.1% as of October, far higher than the 3.3% unemployment rate in Arkansas. Phillips is also struggling to attract new residents. The county’s population count stands at 19,500, down nearly 10% in the last five years.

Source: DigitalFilmWorks / Getty Images

5. California: Lake County
> County median household income: $40,446
> State median household income: $67,169
> Poverty rate: 22.8%
> Unemployment rate: 4.7%

Lake County is located in Northern California, extending into the Mendocino National Forest. The poorest county in the state, Lake County’s median income of $40,446 a year is nearly $27,000 below the California median annual household income.

A relatively weak job market may be partially to blame. Lake County’s 4.7% unemployment rate is higher than both the state unemployment rate of 4.0% and the national rate of 3.8%. Many of the types of jobs common in Lake County are in traditionally low-paying industries like agriculture, forestry, and mining. The concentration of county workers in these industries is more than triple the comparable national concentration.